Parkeren in perifere werkgebieden in de Randstad 1988

<p>Investigation of effectiveness and negative side-effects of parking-measures, aimed at reducing rush-hour traffic and car use in general. The study investigates secondary and tertiary effects of policy-measures with regard to parking. Secondary effects relate to choice between transportation alternatives, tertiary effects to location behaviour of both employees and firms. The study consists of five sub studies: 1. P1024A: Screening of car-drivers to single out commuters, working in nine selected peripheral working areas ( Amsterdam Sloterdijk, Amsterdam Zuid, Amsterdam Zuidoost, Den Haag Bezuidenhout, Schiphol, Rotterdam Noordoost, Den Haag Laakhavens, Rijswijk Plaspoelpolders, Hoofddorp Beukenhorst ). Data on: commuting-time / choice of alternative way of transport if not by car.( N=1124 ) 2. P1024B: Stated preference questionnaire filled out by screened respondents. Data on: preferred transportation alternatives / parking: search-time, costs, walking distance / will parking measures make respondent change job? /car-allowance / job requires use of car? ( N=596 ) 3. P1024C: Tertiary effects of parking measures on employees who recently changed job. Comparison of commuting data of current and former job: distance / means of transportation / parking / parking costs / car allowance / relative importance of factors influencing choice of job / relative importance of commuting factors in choice of current job. ( N=153 ) 4. P1024D: Tertiary effects of parking measures on newly employed. Commuting situation / relative importance of commuting factors in accepting this job / moving / car ownership. ( N=74 ) 5. P1024E: Tertiary effects of parking measures on firms. Parking situation / number of car-commuters employed / public transport connections / will parking measures lead to relocation of the firm? ( N=201 ) Background variables: basic characteristics/ residence/ place of work/ income/capital assets/ education</p>本研究针对以缓解高峰时段交通拥堵、总体减少机动车使用为目标的停车政策的实施效果与潜在负面效应展开调查。本研究聚焦停车政策的次级效应与三级效应：次级效应涉及交通出行方式的选择，三级效应则涵盖雇员与企业的区位选择行为。本研究包含五项子研究：1. P1024A：对在9个选定外围工作区域（阿姆斯特丹·斯劳特迪克、阿姆斯特丹南部商务区、阿姆斯特丹东部片区、海牙贝乌登霍特、史基浦、鹿特丹东北部、海牙拉卡港、里兹维克普拉斯波尔德、霍夫多普比肯霍斯特）任职的机动车驾驶员进行筛查，以筛选出通勤群体。采集数据包括：通勤时长、若非自驾时选择的替代出行方式（有效样本量N=1124）。2. P1024B：由经筛查的受访者填写的陈述偏好（Stated Preference）调查问卷。采集数据包括：偏好的出行方式、停车相关信息（寻车耗时、停车成本、步行距离）、停车政策是否会促使受访者更换工作、汽车补贴、工作是否要求使用机动车（有效样本量N=596）。3. P1024C：针对近期更换工作的雇员，探究停车政策的三级效应。对比其当前与前任工作的通勤数据，内容涵盖：通勤距离、出行方式、停车情况、停车成本、汽车补贴、影响工作选择的因素相对重要性、选择当前工作时通勤相关因素的相对重要性（有效样本量N=153）。4. P1024D：针对新入职雇员，探究停车政策的三级效应。采集数据包括：通勤现状、接受当前工作时通勤相关因素的相对重要性、迁居情况、机动车保有量（有效样本量N=74）。5. P1024E：针对企业主体，探究停车政策的三级效应。采集数据包括：停车配套情况、雇员中自驾通勤者的数量、公共交通接驳条件、停车政策是否会促使企业搬迁（有效样本量N=201）。背景变量包括：基础人口特征、居住地、工作地点、收入水平、可支配资产、受教育程度。