Replication Materials for the Preliminary Validation of the Digital Artifact Management Capability Instrument (DAMCI) for SDGs Reporting in Higher Education

This repository provides the revised replication materials for the preliminary validation of the Digital Artifact Management Capability Instrument (DAMCI), a stakeholder-perception-based instrument grounded in Leavitt's Diamond for examining digital artifact management conditions related to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) reporting in higher education. The public analytical dataset contains 68 valid stakeholder observations representing 59 higher education institutions (HEIs). The empirical unit of observation is the individual stakeholder perception rather than an aggregated institutional score. Institution names, timestamps, respondent-linked free-text roles, and other directly identifying information have been removed from the public analytical materials to protect confidentiality. The repository includes: the complete 30-item bilingual DAMCI codebook; original Indonesian item wording and English translations; verified five-point response anchors in Indonesian and English; numerical response coding; item-level scoring directions and reverse-scoring rules; a privacy-preserving anonymized analytical dataset containing the 68 observations used in the reported SmartPLS analysis; respondent-profile and anonymous institution-profile summaries; respondent-per-institution distribution information; the MPT-to-MPS construct-name crosswalk; the final SmartPLS model/project file (.splsm); saved PLS Algorithm and Bootstrapping result files (.splsrp); associated SmartPLS settings files; an exact privacy-preserving 68 × 30 indicator-only SmartPLS analytical input; SmartPLS output workbooks and exported analytical results; complete outer-loading and bootstrapping results; construct reliability and convergent-validity summaries; Fornell-Larcker, HTMT, and cross-loading matrices; KPK1 and TPS4 sensitivity-analysis results; analytical-settings and preprocessing documentation; a supplementary verification script for data-integrity and selected reproducibility checks; a screenshot of the original Google Forms questionnaire instrument without respondent data; and the 90-record Scopus evidence pool used for construct development, conceptual positioning, and item traceability. SmartPLS reproducibility supplement.In addition to the main Version 2.0.0 replication package, this record includes a dedicated SmartPLS reproducibility supplement containing the final SmartPLS project and result files, associated settings, spreadsheet exports, and the exact privacy-preserving 68 × 30 indicator-level analytical input used for reconstruction of the reported PLS-SEM analyses. The indicator matrix was verified row-by-row and item-by-item against the public anonymized analytical dataset after applying the documented MPT-to-MPS construct-name crosswalk. Confidentiality and analytical provenance.The original analytical source contained identifiable institutional information and respondent-linked contextual fields. These fields are not included in the public materials because they are not required to reproduce the reported measurement and structural analyses. The released analytical input retains the same 68 observations and 30 model indicators used in the reported SmartPLS analysis while excluding direct institutional identifiers. Only materials corresponding to the final reported analysis are included in the public reproducibility package. Version note.Version 2.0.0 corresponds to the first-round peer-review revision of the manuscript. The analytical sample (N = 68), the 30 indicator responses, and the substantive SmartPLS results remain unchanged. This version strengthens documentation, response-anchor verification, respondent-role harmonization, scoring transparency, construct-name harmonization, item-level sensitivity analysis, bootstrap verification, confidentiality protection, and computational reproducibility. Interpretation boundary.These materials are intended to support transparency, auditability, and reproducibility of a preliminary instrument-development study. They do not establish institutional-level benchmarking validity. The current evidence supports stronger preliminary measurement properties for ITP, KAT, PSS, and MPS, whereas KPK remains under-refined and TPS remains borderline, particularly because of the weak TPS4 indicator. The materials should therefore be interpreted as supporting further instrument refinement and independent multi-institutional validation rather than as a finalized institutional benchmarking system. PLS-SEM estimation was conducted using SmartPLS 4. No custom PLS-SEM model-estimation or model-training script was used. The supplementary verification script is provided for data-integrity and selected reproducibility checks based on the shared analytical materials. Related manuscript:Development and Preliminary Validation of a Digital Artifact Management Capability Instrument for Sustainable Development Goals Reporting in Higher Education: A Leavitt's Diamond Perspective