Detection of Khapra Beetle environmental DNA using portable technologies in Australian biosecurity
收藏DataCite Commons2025-05-01 更新2025-05-10 收录
下载链接:
https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.jwstqjq96
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts, 1898, is a serious pest of
stored grain products globally. Environmental DNA (eDNA)-based methods
offer sensitive detection tools used to inform biosecurity officers on the
presence of high-risk pests. This study tested laboratory and portable
molecular technologies to detect khapra beetle environmental DNA extracted
from dust samples collected during biosecurity responses (Tuggeranong and
Fyshwick) to khapra beetle incursions in Australia. Airborne and floor
dust samples were collected opportunistically using handheld vacuum
cleaners and eDNA was extracted using either field or laboratory-based
extraction methods and analyzed using laboratory benchtop real time PCR
machines and portable machines with two TaqMan and one LAMP-based assay.
We successfully collected, extracted, and amplified khapra beetle eDNA
from dust samples by qPCR, but failed to amplify T. granarium eDNA using
LAMP. The Laboratory qPCR machine showed significantly higher mean Ct
values (p < 0.001) and significantly higher positive detections
for both assays (p < 0.001) compared to the portable
thermocycler. DNA yield was significantly higher in samples extracted
using laboratory-based kits compared to field kits (p < 0.001)
for both vacuumed and airborne samples (Mean DNA ± S.D. = 5.52 ± 4.45 and
4.77 ± 1.68 ng/μL, respectively), compared to field kits, (1.75 ± 1.17 and
1.36± 1.29 ng/μL for vacuumed and airborne samples, respectively). There
were no significant differences in DNA yield between collection methods or
differences in amplification associated to extraction or collection
methods in either platform tested in this study. Portable technologies
tested in this study (Franklin™ Real Time Thermocycler and Genie III)
accurately amplified all tissue derived DNA during assay optimisation and
field testing, highlighting the capacity of these technologies to
complement biosecurity in confirming specimen ID. There was a high
incidence of positive detections in field negative controls (Tuggeranong =
12.3 % and Fyshwick = 50 %), mostly attributed to the use of contaminated
vacuum cleaners. We discuss suitable methods to minimize sample
cross-contamination, the potential of portable molecular technologies as
tools for biosecurity applications, and the suitability of eDNA-based
molecular detection methods to complement global trade biosecurity for one
of the most invasive and important grain pests worldwide.
提供机构:
Dryad
创建时间:
2022-04-20



