<b>A Hypothetical Case Study on the International Board of Research &amp; Innovation (IBRI):</b>

This work presents a <b>conceptual framework</b> for the <b>International Board of Research &amp; Innovation (IBRI)</b>, also referred to as the <b>Open Research Foundation (ORF)</b>. The model addresses systemic challenges in the current academic publishing ecosystem, including pay-to-publish practices, restricted access, and the exclusion of young learners and grassroots innovators.The IBRI framework is designed as a <b>non-commercial, certification-based system</b> with the following features:<b>Zero-fee submission model</b> to eliminate financial barriers.<b>Plagiarism and originality checks</b> for ensuring credibility.<b>Acknowledgment of all contributions</b> through certificates, including early-stage or incomplete ideas.<b>Unique certification IDs and archival</b> in the <i>Bank of Ideas (BOI)</i> with periodic uploads to the Harvard Dataverse for DOI-linked authenticity.<b>Inclusivity principle</b> that recognizes contributions starting from the age of seven, enabling equal participation by children, grassroots innovators, teachers, and academicians.The paper includes <b>illustrative case studies</b> (a child’s observation, a farmer’s irrigation technique, and a teacher’s pedagogical innovation) to demonstrate the inclusivity of the model. It also outlines a <b>roadmap to 2050</b>, positioning IBRI as a global standard for originality, ethical validation, and knowledge equity aligned with the <b>UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)</b>.The framework is presented as a <b>conceptual and hypothetical model</b> intended for academic discussion and intellectual engagement. It does not report empirical findings but aims to encourage dialogue on sustainable and inclusive practices in global research.

本研究提出了面向**国际研究与创新理事会（International Board of Research & Innovation, IBRI）**（亦称为**开放研究基金会（Open Research Foundation, ORF）**）的概念框架。该模型针对当前学术出版生态系统中的系统性挑战展开应对，包括付费出版模式、获取权限受限，以及对青年学习者与基层创新者的排斥。IBRI框架被设计为**非商业化、基于认证的体系**，具备以下特征：**零费用投稿模式**以消除财务壁垒；**抄袭与原创性审核机制**以保障成果可信度；**全贡献认可机制**，通过证书形式认可所有贡献成果，涵盖早期创意或未完成的研究构想；**唯一认证标识与归档服务**，将成果归档至*创意库（Bank of Ideas, BOI）*，并定期上传至哈佛数据文库（Harvard Dataverse），以关联数字对象唯一标识符（Digital Object Identifier, DOI）实现可溯源的真实性保障；**包容性原则**，认可7岁及以上人群的贡献成果，保障儿童、基层创新者、教师与科研人员均可平等参与。本文附带三篇说明性案例研究（分别为一名儿童的观察记录、一位农民的灌溉技术方案及一名教师的教学创新实践），用以展示该体系的包容性特质。此外，本文还规划了**至2050年的发展路线图**，将IBRI定位为契合**联合国可持续发展目标（United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs）**的原创性认证、伦理核验与知识公平领域的全球标准。本框架以**概念性假设模型**形式呈现，旨在供学术探讨与思想交流使用。本研究未汇报实证研究结果，其核心目标为推动全球科研领域可持续与包容性实践的对话交流。