ESCT v9.7a: Corrected Supplement — Citation Accuracy, Dimensional Notation, and Limitation Consistency Error Correction Document for ESCT v9.6 OP9 Supplement and v9.7 Purdon Correspondence

ESCT v9.7a is an error-correction document addressing three issues identified during cross-document review of ESCT v9.6 and v9.7. No mathematical equations, parameter values, or falsifiable predictions are modified.Correction 1 (Citation): Table 4 of the OP9 Supplement incorrectly attributed five representative broadband PSD values (2.5, 4.1, 7.8, 52.0, 98.0 µV²/Hz) to Purdon et al. (2013, PNAS). These values do not appear in that paper, which reports only baseline-normalized relative power — standard practice in the propofol EEG literature. The values are relabeled as estimates derived from Niedermeyer (2005) and relative increase ratios qualitatively consistent with Purdon et al. (2013).Correction 2 (Notation): The OP9 calibration formula was written as noise_model = √(PSD) / PSD_ref, producing a dimensional mismatch in its written form. The formula is restated as the operationally defined dimensionless ratio noise_model = √(PSD / PSD_ref), where PSD_ref = 20.0 µV²/Hz [Niedermeyer 2005]. Numerical results are unchanged.Correction 3 (Consistency): Limitation 1 of the v9.6 Main Paper stated that OP9 “remains open” despite the simultaneous release of the OP9 Supplement. Limitation 1 is updated to reflect partial resolution, with two stated sub-limitations: the estimated status of Table 4 PSD values, and the underived ×5 broadband scaling factor.After correction, the framework’s evidential status is accurately characterized as: theoretically complete and empirically testable, with Level 1 (directional) and Level 2 (order-of-magnitude, estimate-based) correspondence to Purdon et al. (2013) achieved, and Level 3 individual-subject validation pending PhysioNet data access (doi:10.13026/C2CC73).Qualia ∉ Domain(Ĉ(ω,t)) — The Hard Problem is not solved. It is precisely bounded.