Data extraction information.

ObjectivesThis meta-analysis aims to assess the association between adult nap duration and risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases (CVD).MethodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched to identify eligible studies. The quality of observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We performed all statistical analyses using Stata software version 14.0. For the meta-analysis, we calculated hazard ratio (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To assess publication bias, we used a funnel plot and Egger’s test.ResultsA total of 21 studies involving 371,306 participants revealed varying methodological quality, from moderate to high. Those who indulged in daytime naps faced a significantly higher mortality risk than non-nappers (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.18–1.38; I2 = 38.8%; P2 = 62.6%; P = 0.971). However, napping for 1 hour or more correlated with a 1.22-fold increased risk of mortality (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.12–1.33; I2 = 40.0%; P2 = 87.9%; P = 0.031). Napping for less than 1 hour did not significantly impact CVD risk (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.87–1.12; I2 = 86.4%; P = 0.721). However, napping for 1 hour or more was linked to a 1.37-fold increased risk of CVD (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.09–1.71; I2 = 68.3%; P = 0.007).ConclusionsOur meta-analysis indicates that taking a nap increases the risk of overall mortality and CVD mortality. It highlights that the long duration time of the nap can serve as a risk factor for evaluating both overall mortality and cardiovascular mortality.