five

Nucleotide differences between C. abortus and C. psittaci rRNA molecules compared with related taxaa.

收藏
Figshare2015-12-02 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Nucleotide_differences_between_C_abortus_and_C_psittaci_rRNA_molecules_compared_with_related_taxa_a_/442450
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
aMore than three accession numbers for each species or family, including the type strain, were analyzed (the majority of analyzed strains and their accession numbers are given in the Figures S2, S3, and S4).bNucleotide positions of the 16S and 23S domain I rRNA are given according to the E. coli J01695 secondary structure numbering system [35]; 16S–23S Intergenic Spacer positions based on primary structure is given according to the C. abortus type strain B577T sequence (U68445). Signature and unique residues for C. abortus strains and the corresponding positions are shown in bold; see text for details. Dashes indicate nucleotide gaps in rRNA sequence comparison.cSingle base frequencies within domain Bacteria (dataset from http://www.rna.ccbb.utexas.edu/SAE/2A/nt_Frequency/).†Nucleotide in C. abortus LLG/POS variant;‡Nucleotide in C. abortus FAG/VPG variant;*Nucleotide in C. psittaci Prk/Daruma variant including the Prk/Daruma (acc. nos. D85710, AF481048), Prk46, Prk48, Prk49 (acc. nos. AB001809, AB001810, and AB001811, respectively), 84/2334 and 1V (acc. nos. AJ310736 and EF165622, respectively) strains.
创建时间:
2015-12-02
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作