NHFOV vs NIPPV, subgroup analysis for risk of bias.
收藏数据链接：
官方服务：
资源简介：
NHFOV vs NIPPV, subgroup analysis for risk of bias.
应用场景：
创建时间：
2024-07-30
相关数据集
Table1_Use of NHFOV vs. NIPPV for the respiratory support of preterm newborns after extubation: A meta-analysis.docx
ObjectivesThis meta-analysis evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) and nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) f
NIAID Data Ecosystem40
Supplementary Material for: A new tool to assess patient-ventilator synchrony in preterm infants receiving non-invasive ventilation: a randomized crossover pilot study
Introduction: Nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) is an effective non-invasive ventilation technique, especially for preterm infants. Patient-ventilator synchrony is
DataCite Commons2025-01-25 更新30
Dataset from A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Seattle-PAP for the Respiratory Support of Premature Infants
This study is designed to test the hypothesis that among infants born at less than 30 weeks, weighing less than 1500 g at delivery, and receiving initial respiratory support non-invasively or on inv
NIAID Data Ecosystem20
Table2_Individualized dynamic PEEP (dynPEEP) vs. positive pressure ventilation in delivery room management: A retrospective cohort study.docx
ObjectiveAlthough nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is recommended in delivery room (DR) management for preterm infants, the effect of delivering nCPAP at 6–8 cmH2O is not satisfactory
NIAID Data Ecosystem40
Values of minute ventilation (MV) and rate of CO2 elimination (VCO 2 ) for infants supported with continuous positive airway pressure (+CPAP) and infants requiring positive pressure ventilation (+PPV).
Data are presented as median (IQR) for MV and VCO2.
NIAID Data Ecosystem30
