Nurse Stigma with Opioid Addicted Patients Integrative Review Search Strategy

To identify studies to include or consider for this integrative review, the review team worked with a medical librarian (TN) to develop detailed search strategies for each database. The PRISMA-S extension was followed for search reporting. The medical librarian (TN) developed the search for PubMed (NLM) and translated the search for every database searched. The PubMed (NLM) search strategy was reviewed by the research team to check for accuracy and term relevancy, and all final searches were peer-reviewed by another medical librarian. The databases included in this search are PubMed (NLM), CINAHL (EbscoHost), PsycInfo (EbscoHost), Embase (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) using a combination of keywords and subject headings. A grey literature search included TRIP Pro medical database (tripdatabase.com) website, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (samhsa.gov), National Academy of Medicine, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. There were no limits to the search. All final searches were performed on January 17, 2023 by the librarian and were fully reported (TN). The full search strategies as reported by the librarian are provided in Appendix(___). A summary of the search results from databases: PubMed (NLM) from inception to 01/17/2023 (1,118 Results), CINAHL (EbscoHost) from inception to 01/17/2023 (3,662 Results), PsycInfo (EbscoHost) from inception to 01/17/2023 (103 Results), Embase (Elsevier) from inception to 01/17/2023 (2,119 Results), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) from inception to 01/17/2023 (156 Results). The search resulted in 7,421 studies and 1,710 duplicate studies were found and omitted by the librarian (TN) using the EndNote 20 duplicate identification strategy. This resulted in 5,702 records to screen from databases or registers and 221 records to screen from other methods, resulting in a total of 5,923 records. Studies were screened by title and abstract by two blinded and independent reviewers. If a tiebreaker was needed, a third reviewer was called in. This process was repeated for full text article screening and article selection.