Additional file 2 of Selection signatures for local and regional adaptation in Chinese Mongolian horse breeds reveal candidate genes for hoof health

Additional file 2: Table S1. Composite Selection Signals (CSS) results for Wushen vs. other Chinese Mongolian populations. Table S2. Composite Selection Signals (CSS) results for Abaga Black vs. other Chinese Mongolian populations (top 0.1% SNPs threshold). Table S3. Composite Selection Signals (CSS) results for Abaga Black vs. other Chinese Mongolian populations (top 1% SNPs threshold). Table S4. Composite Selection Signals (CSS) results for Iron Hoof vs. other Chinese Mongolian populations (top 0.1% SNPs threshold). Table S5. Composite Selection Signals (CSS) results for Asia vs. American/ Middle Eastern horse. Table S6. Functional annotation table for the genes identified within the selection signals in the comparison Asia vs. American/Middle Eastern horse. Table S7. Composite Selection Signals (CSS) results for Asian vs. European horse. Table S8. Functional annotation table for the genes identified within the selection signals in the comparison Asian versus European horse. Table S9. Genotype frequencies for the top SNP (chr3.35533253, rs68458737) were calculated for a range of global horse breeds. Table S10. Traits, contrasting groups, number of populations and individuals, genotype information (SNPs), known genes for the traits of interest and dataset code.