Comparisons between the Four HFD Tests of Intelligence for their Correlation with Wechsler or Stanford-Binet tests, Overall Hit Rate, and False Positive and False Negative Rates for Borderline and Superior Score Classifications.
收藏Figshare2015-12-02 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Comparisons_between_the_Four_HFD_Tests_of_Intelligence_for_their_Correlation_with_Wechsler_or_Stanford_Binet_tests_Overall_Hit_Rate_and_False_Positive_and_False_Negative_Rates_for_Borderline_and_Superior_Score_Classifications_/667801
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
1Derived from Reisman and Yamokoski [26].2Clinical population from Aikman et al. [29] in italics; overall hit rate, false + and – rates with visual-motor functioning partialed out.3Derived from Willcock et al. [33]. The false + and – rates for superior intellectual functioning have not been previously published.4*significant at pp5Average: 90–119, Superior: >120.6Borderline: 110.7Borderline: 120.8False + and – rates based on scores >110 for the Aikman et al. [29] data with clinical population.
创建时间:
2015-12-02



