A comparison between transcriptome sequencing and 16S metagenomics for detection of bacterial pathogens in wildlife
收藏DataONE2020-06-24 更新2025-06-14 收录
下载链接:
https://search.dataone.org/view/sha256:af1b6f337044f3d23937a3a6bb97ca0f68848c90cf1839eb7b6e8058204f7a3e
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Background: Rodents are major reservoirs of pathogens responsible for numerous zoonotic diseases in humans and livestock. Assessing their microbial diversity at both the individual and population level is crucial for monitoring endemic infections and revealing microbial association patterns within reservoirs. Recently, NGS approaches have been employed to characterize microbial communities of different ecosystems. Yet, their relative efficacy has not been assessed. Here, we compared two NGS approaches, RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) and 16S-metagenomics, assessing their ability to survey neglected zoonotic bacteria in rodent populations. Methodology/Principal Findings: We first extracted nucleic acids from the spleens of 190 voles collected in France. RNA extracts were pooled, randomly retro-transcribed, then RNA-Seq was performed using HiSeq. Assembled bacterial sequences were assigned to the closest taxon registered in GenBank. DNA extracts were analyzed via a 16S-metagenomics approach usin...
创建时间:
2025-06-12



