five

Bank Account Structure and Couples’ Relationship Dynamics Study 1, 2017

收藏
DataCite Commons2024-10-15 更新2025-04-16 收录
下载链接:
https://dataverse.unc.edu/citation?persistentId=doi:10.15139/S3/LYVXMY
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
230 male–female couples (460 individuals) were recruited via social media, Craigslist, word-of-mouth at bridal shows, wedding blogs, and mailing letters to customers on a jeweler’s mailing list for a 2-year longitudinal study examining the transition to marriage. To be eligible, both partners had to be entering their first marriage and currently be either (1) engaged to be married or (2) married for less than 1 year. The couple had to consist of one male and one female and be currently living in the United States. They were also required to have entirely separate bank accounts at study entry, a requirement they were unaware of when completing the screener. On average, partners had known each other for 5 years and were romantically involved for 3 years. Ten percent of couples had children. Partners’ median age was 28 (range: 18–58), and the median household income was $50,000 (range: $0–$450,000); 52% had earned at least a bachelor’s degree, and 74% identified as White or Caucasian. After completing the intake survey, couples were assigned to one of three bank account structure conditions. In the Separate Condition, couples were told to continue using separate checking and savings accounts. In the Joint Condition, couples were told to open and only use joint checking and/or savings account(s). In the No-Intervention Condition, couples were told that they could manage their money however they liked. Across all three conditions, participants independently completed 5 follow-up assessments over the course of the study: 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months after the intake survey. The surveys contained a variety of measures commonly used in relationships research (e.g., Couples Satisfaction Index, Funk and Rogge, 2007), as well as many measures assessing the couples' finances and financial attitudes (e.g., Financial Harmony Scale, Rick, Small, and Finkel, 2011). This research was approved by The University of Michigan’s Institutional Review Board (# HUM00058917).
提供机构:
UNC Dataverse
创建时间:
2024-08-16
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作