Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) - Ukraine
收藏microdata.fao.org2023-07-10 更新2025-03-25 收录
下载链接:
https://microdata.fao.org/index.php/catalog/2497
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Abstract
---------------------------
Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 2.1 commits countries to end hunger, ensure access by all people to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year around. Indicator 2.1.2, “Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES)”, provides internationally-comparable estimates of the proportion of the population facing difficulties in accessing food. More detailed background information is available at http://www.fao.org/in-action/voices-of-the-hungry/fies/en/ .
The FIES-based indicators are compiled using the FIES survey module, containing 8 questions. Two indicators can be computed:
1. The proportion of the population experiencing moderate or severe food insecurity (SDG indicator 2.1.2),
2. The proportion of the population experiencing severe food insecurity.
These data were collected by FAO through the Gallup World Poll. General information on the methodology can be found here: https://www.gallup.com/178667/gallup-world-poll-work.aspx. National institutions can also collect FIES data by including the FIES survey module in nationally representative surveys.
Microdata can be used to calculate the indicator 2.1.2 at national level. Instructions for computing this indicator are described in the methodological document available in the documentations tab. Disaggregating results at sub-national level is not encouraged because estimates will suffer from substantial sampling and measurement error.
Geographic coverage
---------------------------
National
Analysis unit
---------------------------
Individuals
Universe
---------------------------
Individuals of 15 years or older with access to landline and/or mobile phones.
Kind of data
---------------------------
Sample survey data [ssd]
Sampling procedure
---------------------------
NA
Exclusions: NA
Design effect: 1.89
Mode of data collection
---------------------------
Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing [CATI]
Cleaning operations
---------------------------
Statistical validation assesses the quality of the FIES data collected by testing their consistency with the assumptions of the Rasch model. This analysis involves the interpretation of several statistics that reveal 1) items that do not perform well in a given context, 2) cases with highly erratic response patterns, 3) pairs of items that may be redundant, and 4) the proportion of total variance in the population that is accounted for by the measurement model.
Sampling error estimates
---------------------------
The margin of error is estimated as 4.3. This is calculated around a proportion at the 95% confidence level. The maximum margin of error was calculated assuming a reported percentage of 50% and takes into account the design effect.
Data appraisal
---------------------------
The variable DEGURBA was not considered in the computation of the published FAO food insecurity indicator based on FIES due to the results of the validation process.
摘要
---------------------------
可持续发展目标(SDG)2.1致力于各国终结饥饿,确保所有人全年都能获得安全、营养充足的食物。指标2.1.2,‘基于食物不安全体验量表(FIES)的食物不安全普遍程度’,提供了国际上可比较的估算,用以衡量面临食物获取困难的人口比例。更详细的相关背景信息可参考http://www.fao.org/in-action/voices-of-the-hungry/fies/en/ 。
基于FIES的指标是通过包含8个问题的FIES调查模块编制而成。可以计算两个指标:
1. 经历中等到严重食物不安全的人口比例(SDG指标2.1.2),
2. 经历严重食物不安全的人口比例。
这些数据由FAO通过盖洛普世界民意调查收集。关于方法论的一般信息可在此处找到:https://www.gallup.com/178667/gallup-world-poll-work.aspx。国家机构也可以通过在国家代表性调查中包含FIES调查模块来收集FIES数据。
微观数据可用于计算国家级的2.1.2指标。计算此指标的方法描述在文档标签中的方法论文件中。不建议在次国家层面进行结果细分,因为估计值将受到显著的抽样和测量误差的影响。
地理覆盖范围
---------------------------
全国
分析单位
---------------------------
个人
总体
---------------------------
15岁及以上、拥有固定电话和/或移动电话的个人。
数据类型
---------------------------
样本调查数据[ssd]
抽样程序
---------------------------
NA
排除项:NA
设计效应:1.89
数据收集方式
---------------------------
计算机辅助电话访谈[CATI]
清洗操作
---------------------------
统计验证通过测试FIES数据的Rasch模型假设的一致性来评估其质量。该分析涉及解释几个统计量,这些统计量揭示了1)在特定环境中表现不佳的项目,2)具有高度不规则响应模式的案例,3)可能重复的项目对,以及4)由测量模型解释的总体中总变异的比例。
抽样误差估计
---------------------------
误差范围估计为4.3。这是在95%置信水平下围绕比例计算的。最大误差范围是在假设报告百分比为50%的情况下计算的,并考虑了设计效应。
数据评估
---------------------------
由于验证过程的结果,变量DEGURBA未被纳入基于FIES的FAO食物不安全指标的计算。
提供机构:
microdata.fao.org



