Food fraud vulnerability assessment responses data for food specialists and meat consumers

Two groups of participants were used for this dataset, namely food specialists and meat consumers. The sample for the meat consumer were conveniently selected within a radius of twenty kilometers from Pretoria Central. Sampling participants were also on availability, accessibility, geographic proximity and willingness to participate in the study. The food specialists were selected because of their expertise in vulnerability issues of food fraud. However, the challenge was gathering data when mobility was restricted (COVID-19). Both questionnaires included close-ended and open-ended questions to get better insights from both participants and a pre-survey was done on ten meat consumers and five food specialists. Collected data was analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences Version 27. Data was edited, and coded. However, sampling was only done in Pretoria and excluded other metropolitan areas, and the budget was limited for techniques and data collection.

本数据集采用两组参与者进行研究，包括食品专家和肉类消费者。肉类消费者的样本选取位于比勒陀利亚市中心二十公里范围内，选取标准基于便利性、可达性、地理邻近以及参与研究的意愿。食品专家因其对食品欺诈脆弱性问题之专长而被选入。然而，在（COVID-19）流动性受限的情况下收集数据构成了挑战。两项问卷均包含封闭式和开放式问题，以获取来自双方的更深入见解。对十名肉类消费者和五名食品专家进行了预调查。所收集的数据使用IBM社会科学统计软件包第27版进行分析。数据经过编辑和编码。然而，样本仅限于比勒陀利亚，排除了其他大都市地区，且技术及数据收集预算有限。