Replication data for Ranking Candidates in Local Elections Neither Panacea nor Catastrophe for Candidates of Color

Electoral rules can affect who wins, who loses, and how voters feel about the electoral process. Most cities select office holders through plurality rule, but an alternative, ranked choice voting (RCV), has become increasingly popular. RCV requires voters to rank candidates, instead of simply selecting their most preferred candidate. Observers debate whether RCV will cure a variety of electoral ills or undermine representation. We test the effect of RCV on voter’s choices and perceptions of representation using survey experiments with large, representative samples of respondents. We find that candidates of color are significantly penalized in both plurality and RCV elections, with no significant difference between the rule types. However, providing respondents with candidates’ partisan affiliation significantly increases support for candidates of color.