Table 6 in Phylogeny, evolution, and classification of the ant genus Lasius, the tribe Lasiini and the subfamily Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Table 6. Results of ANOVA tests on alternative ancestral state estimation models.
Divergence datingBiogeography reconstructionFBD IGRclockFBDTK02 clockUniformIGRclockUniform TK 02 clockDEC (lnL − 136.77)DIVALIKE (lnL − 132.24)BAYAREALIKE (lnL − 150.98)NodeMeanage(95 % HPD)PPMeanage(95 % HPD)PPMean age(95 % HPD)PPMean age (95 % HPD)PPRangeLikelihoodRangeLikelihoodRangeLikelihoodLasiiniCore LasiiniMetalasius + Prenolepis g. grp.70.0 (57.6 –82.7) 62.3 (51.2 –72.9) 51.1 (42.2 –60.2)0.990.940.9997.2 (89.6 – 106.0) 88.6 (79.8 – 97.8) 71.0 (60.8 – 81.9)0.910.641.0080.8(68.6 – 91.8) 72.5(59.0 – 85.4) 59.9(48.7 –72.8)0.96 0.94 0.99100.0 (90.9 – 112.3) 92.0 (83.5 – 102.2) 75.6 (65.1 – 86.5)0.94 0.49 1.00PI P P0.33 0.42 0.40PI P P0.37 0.56 0.53PI PI PI0.43 0.43 0.48Prenolepis g. grp. Lasius g. grp. Crown Lasiusniger clade flavus clade Myrmecocystus39.0 (36.5 –50.9) 24.9 (18.0 – 33.0) 21.9 (15.3 – 28.6) 15.8 (10.0 – 21.6) 15.7 (10.4 – 21.0) 14.6 (7.3 – 21.5)0.471.000.771.001.001.0053.1 (43.6 – 62.6) 67.9 (54.9 – 81.6) 63.7 (52.4 – 75.1) 53.2 (41.2 – 65.3) 49.1 (36.7 – 61.8) 47.9 (33.5 – 63.1)1.000.990.630.701.001.0050.9(40.8 – 61.3) 31.1(22.4 – 40.5) 27.3(19.4 – 35.6) 20.0(12.7 – 27.7) 19.7(13.2– 26.8) 17.8(8.9 – 26.9)1.00 0.99 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.0057.0 (48.2 – 66.5) 73.7 (61.9 – 88.3) 64.3 (58.4 – 82.2) 60.6 (46.1 – 73.0) 55.9 (41.1 – 69.4) 55.8 (40.0 – 69.8)1.00 0.99 0.71 0.56 1.00 1.00PI NaP P P Na Na0.42 0.53 0.72 0.87 0.71 0.87PI Na P P Na Na0.50 0.55 0.71 0.99 0.90 0.97PI NaP NaP NaP NaP Na0.64 0.84 0.87 0.62 0.91 0.53