five

Data and numerical model for testing multifrequency analysis of temperature time series in streambeds

收藏
doi.org2017-10-13 更新2025-01-21 收录
下载链接:
https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.cdd0ccc37c3b43179d63a4fcb2786c2d
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Although usage of the inverse solution of the one-dimensional advection-diffusion equation for estimating streambed fluid fluxes, bed elevation changes, or bed thermal diffusivity have historically assumed the need for sinusoidal or at least nominally sinusoidal surface boundary temperature fluctuations, it is technically not a requirement. It has similarly been assumed that gradients in temperature in the bed would cause errors in parameter estimates. A published mathematical derivation (Luce et al., 2017) demonstrates that this is not true, but laboratory experiments and numerical modeling were done to support the illustration of the consequences of the derivation. These data are supplied here. Reference: Luce, C. H., Tonina, D., Applebee, R., & DeWeese, T. (2017). Was that assumption necessary? Reconsidering boundary conditions for analytical solutions to estimate streambed fluxes. Water Resources Research. doi: 10.1002/2017WR020618

尽管在历史上,使用一维对流-扩散方程的逆解来估算河床流体通量、河床高程变化或河床热扩散率时,曾假定需要正弦波或至少名义上的正弦波表面边界温度波动,但实际上这一条件并非必要。同样,人们也曾认为河床中温度梯度的存在会导致参数估计出现误差。一篇已发表的数学推导(Luce 等人,2017年)证明了这一点并不成立,为此进行了实验室实验和数值模拟以支持该推导的结论展示。此处提供的数据即为此目的。 参考文献: Luce, C. H., Tonina, D., Applebee, R., & DeWeese, T. (2017). 该假设必要吗?重新审视用于估算河床通量的解析解的边界条件。水资源研究。doi: 10.1002/2017WR020618
提供机构:
HydroShare
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作