Data for 'Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of Divergence Analyses: the Age of Butterflies Revisited'

Data and results for Chazot et al. (2018) 'Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of Divergence Analyses: the Age of Butterflies Revisited.' S1. List of taxa and Genbank accession codes. S2. Molecular matrix for the core analysis (S2a), the reduced dataset (S2b) and the dataset with a mitochondrial fragment (S2c). S3. RAxML topology (S3a) and time-calibrated tree (S3b) obtained from the core analysis. In S3a, numbers at the nodes indicate rapid-bootstrap support values. In S3b, node ages are the median of node age posterior distributions. S4. Tree obtained when using only deep-level fossil calibrations. Node ages are the median of node age posterior distributions. S5. Tree obtained when using only shallow-level fossil calibrations. Node ages are the median of node age posterior distributions. S6. Tree obtained from the reduced dataset. Node ages are the median of node age posterior distributions. S7. Tree obtained when using exponential fossil calibration priors. Node ages are the median of node age posterior distributions. S8. Tree obtained when adding a mitochondrial gene fragment. Node ages are the median of node age posterior distributions. S9. Tree obtained when using fossil information only modeled using lognormal priors. Node ages are the median of node age posterior distributions. S10. Tree obtained when using the host-plant ages obtained from Foster et al. (2017). In S10a node ages are the median of node age posterior distributions, while in S10b the node ages are the mode the mode of the kernel density estimate of the posterior distribution. S11. Tree obtained when using a Yule prior instead of Birth-Death tree prior. Node ages are the median of node age posterior distributions.