Rebound tonometry versus Goldmann tonometry in school children: feasibility and agreement of intraocular pressure measurements
收藏Figshare2015-12-01 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Rebound_tonometry_versus_Goldmann_tonometry_in_school_children_feasibility_and_agreement_of_intraocular_pressure_measurements/7101578
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
ABSTRACT Purpose: High intraocular pressure (IOP) is an important risk factor for a variety of pediatric ophthalmic conditions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, length of examination, and corneal epithelial damage induced by rebound tonometry (RBT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in school children. Methods: Healthy children (n=57) participated in a randomized, transversal study with IOP measurement by GAT followed by RBT (study arm 1) or RBT followed by GAT (study arm 2). The number of attempts to acquire a reliable IOP measurement and the length of the examination were quantified. Corneal epithelial damage induced by tonometry was evaluated. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to establish the level of agreement between the two techniques. Results: The IOP was measured in all children with at least one of the devices. In both study arms, more children failed to be examined with GAT than with RBT (26% vs. 4%, and 16% vs. 6%, p
创建时间:
2015-12-01



