five

Differences between the PubMed record and full-text methods section in in-vivo animal research articles

收藏
Figshare2021-08-10 更新2026-04-08 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Differences_between_the_PubMed_record_and_full-text_methods_section_in_in-vivo_animal_research_articles/7697816/3
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Large animal protocols submitted to Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) are required to include searches for alternatives and address the “3Rs": <br><br>1. Refinement: use methodology and protocols that reduce pain and distress<br>2. Replacement: substitute animals with non-animal models or lower species<br>3. Reduction: minimize the number of animals <br>Locating descriptions of methodology for the refinement concept is challenging since PubMed (and most other databases) do not search full-text. <br>The objectives of this study were to determine how well the title, abstract, and MeSH terms cover the content of the methods section in in-vivo animal research articles, particularly with respect to procedures, drugs, and animal species used, and to describe how this might impact a search.<br>The title/abstract, MeSH terms, and methods section of each article were reviewed and details such as: animal species, number of animals, description of housing, description of experimental procedures used, and analgesia/anesthesia were extracted. <br><br>Articles were screened from April 2017 - September 2017. <br><br>Details for the methodology used and description of uploaded files are provided in the README.txt file. <br>
提供机构:
Tuttle, Brandi; Brody, Erica; Mazure, Emily; Ratajeski, Melissa; Gau, Karen
创建时间:
2021-08-10
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务