Supplementary materials to: The impact of sexism on leadership in female-male climbing dyads

Supplementary materials to: Kulich, C., de Lemus, S., & Montañés, P. (2020). The impact of sexism on leadership in female-male climbing dyads. Social Psychological Bulletin, 15(1), Article e2667. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.2667 The following Supplementary Materials are available: Datasets: the data used in Study 1 [.sav], the data of male participants used in Study 2 [.sav], the data of female participants used in Study 2 [.sav]; Additional Measures for Study 2: The supplementary materials present additional measures on attractiveness ratings of the climber profiles rated in Study 2. These ratings are analyzed and compared to the previous literature [.pdf]. Appendices: Appendix A: This appendix includes tables with descriptive statistics for data from Study 1. It further presents tables with full results for an analysis reported in the article (Leading in Alpine Climbing as a Function of Partner Gender, Sexist Attitudes (ASI), and Expertise), as well as tables for the same analysis using a climbing specific sexism measure (Leading in Alpine Climbing as a Function of Partner Gender, Climbing-Specific Benevolent Sexism (BSc) and Hostile Sexism (HSc), and Expertise) [.pdf]; Appendix B: This appendix includes additional materials for Study 2: an example of the manipulation materials used (profiles of a climber), a figure which represents the means and standard errors of the manipulation checks, a correlation table of all measures and two tables which report full results of an analysis reported in the article (Parameter Estimates of Leading Intentions with Male Climbing Targets as a Function of Targets’ and Participants’ Gender Ideology) [.pdf]. notReviewed publishedVersion