Erdem Onan - PhD Projectdata for study 5

<B>Title</B><BR><BR>
Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Lung Auscultation through Interleaved Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Field Study<BR><BR>
<B>Summary</B><BR><BR>
This research investigated the effectiveness of blocked and interleaved practice in diagnosing abnormal respiratory sounds. Conducted as a quasi-experimental study, it involved nursing students from two classrooms at Akdeniz University. The study took place in a whole classroom environment as part of their on-going education. Key dependent variables were students’ diagnostic accuracy, monitoring accuracy, and learning strategy beliefs.<BR><BR>
<B>Data Description</B><BR><BR>
1. Category learning judgments: <BR>
• NB (Normal Bronc.), NV (Normal Ves.), CF (Crackle Fine), CC (Crackle Course), WH (Wheezing), RH (Rhonchi) # Individual judgments 0-100.<BR>
• JOL: Average of monitoring judgments.<BR><BR>
2. Diagnostic Accuracy<BR>
• Q1-12 raw answers.<BR>
• CF1  CC2; accuracy scores at the sound level. #Immediate test.<BR>
• Test_IM: Aggregated test score for the immediate test.<BR>
• NV3  WH4: accuracy scores at the sound level. # delayed test.<BR>
• Test_D: Aggregated test score at the delayed test.<BR>
• Effort: Anticipated effort associated with blocking and interleaving<BR>
- B for blocking, I for interleaving.<BR>
• Belief: Strategy beliefsv
- 1: Blocking, 0 Equal, 2 Interleaving. <BR><BR>