Summary of the 6 transcript-derived fragments (TDFs)^a

aDifferential expression between ARE- and H2O-treated Meloidogyne incognita infective juveniles. bPresence (Y) or absence (N) of signal peptide (SP) was determined by using SignalP software. When no full cDNA or protein sequence was available, the presence of a SP was not determined (ND). cPutative localisation of the protein corresponding to the TDFs was analysed using WoLF PSORT software. Only 1 predicted localisation was reported when the score was ≥18. dProteins were classified by family using the classification published in Bellafiore et al., 2008. (1 = proteins interacting with actin/microtubules, 2 = proteins interacting with nucleic acids, 3 = post-translational modifications, protein turnover, and chaperone functions, 4 = metabolism, 5 = signal transduction, 6 = protein synthesis and secretion, 7 = detoxification, 8 = cell wall modification enzymes, 9 = others). eGene expression is reported for ARE-treated nematodes in comparison to H2O-treated nematodes (2 biological repeats).