Tree mortality risks under climate change in Europe: assessment of silviculture practices and genetic conservation networks
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-13 收录
下载链接:
https://zenodo.org/record/5160130
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
General context: Climate change can positively or negatively affect abiotic and biotic drivers of tree mortality. Process-based models integrating these climatic effects are only seldom used at species distribution scale.
Objective: The main objective of this study was to investigate the multi-causal mortality risk of five major European forest tree species across their distribution range from an ecophysiological perspective, to quantify the impact of forest management practices on this risk and to identify threats on the genetic conservation network.
Methods: We used the process-based ecophysiological model CASTANEA to simulate the mortality risk of \textit{Fagus sylvatica}, \textit{Quercus petraea}, \textit{Pinus sylvestris}, \textit{Pinus pinaster} and \textit{Picea abies} under current and future climate conditions, while considering local silviculture practices. The mortality risk was assessed by a composite risk index \textit{(CRIM)} integrating the risks of carbon starvation, hydraulic failure and frost damage. We took into account extreme climatic events with the \textit{CRIM$_{max}$}, computed as the maximum annual value of the \textit{CRIM}.
Results: The physiological processes' contributions to \textit{CRIM} differed among species: it was mainly driven by hydraulic failure for \textit{P. sylvestris} and \textit{Q. petraea}, by frost damage for \textit{P. abies}, by carbon starvation for \textit{P. pinaster}, and by a combination of hydraulic failure and frost damage for \textit{F. sylvatica}. Under future climate, projection showed an increase of \textit{CRIM} for \textit{P. pinaster} but a decrease for \textit{P. abies}, \textit{Q. petraea} and \textit{F. sylvatica}, and little variation for \textit{P. sylvestris}. Under the harshest future climatic scenario, forest management decreased the mean \textit{CRIM} for \textit{P. sylvestris}, increased it for \textit{P. abies} and \textit{P. pinaster} and had no major impact for the two broadleaved species. By the year 2100, 38\% to 90\% of the conservation units are at extinction threat (\textit{CRIM$_{max}$}=1), depending on the species.
Conclusions: Using a process-based ecophysiological model allowed us to disentangle the multiple drivers of tree mortality under current and future climate. Taking into account the positive effect of increased CO$_2$ on fertilization and water use efficiency, the average risks may increase or decrease in the future depending on species and sites. However, considering extreme climatic events, future projections are as pessimistic than those obtained with bioclimatic niche models.
Abbreviation for column:
X Longitude
Y Latitude
LAImax Leaf area index max reach
Nha Density per hectar
Vha Volume per hectar
NEE Net ecosystem exchange
NPP net primary production
Reco Respiration ecosystem
GPP Gross primary production
Etveg Evapotranspiration canopy
Etsol Evapotranspiration sol
TR tree transpiration
ETP evapotranspiration potentiel
BiomassOfReserves Biomass of reserve
rw ring width
dbh diameter at breast heast
height height
BBday Budburst date
rFD risk of frost
CRIM_max Maximum combined risk index of mortality reach
rNSC risk of carbon starvation
rPLC risk of embolism
rPLC_max Maximum risk of embolism reach
CRIM combined risk index of mortality
Climate Climatic model
rNSC_max maximum risk of carbon starvation reach
rFD_max Maximum risk of frost reach
Scenario_Sylvicol null means no silvulcture simulated
species species
Country Country
alt_watch altitude of climate simulated
grid_watch number of the pixel point of WATCH
grid_eurocordex number of the pixel point of Eurocordex
Pinus_sylvestris 0 abscence ; 1 presence
Fagus_sylvatica 0 abscence ; 1 presence
Quercus_petraea 0 abscence ; 1 presence
Picea_abies 0 abscence ; 1 presence
Pinus_pinaster 0 abscence ; 1 presence
创建时间:
2021-12-01



