Table – Stability Study OcryGel vs EyelubPro.xlsx

This table summarizes the results of a prospective, controlled, crossover study comparing the in vivo corneal retention of two carbomer-based ophthalmic gels — OcryGel and EyelubPro — in 20 anesthetized dogs. Using Spectral Domain Full-Range Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT), central tear film thickness (CTFT) was measured before and after a single instillation of each product at predefined timepoints: baseline, 1, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes. The study aimed to assess and compare the stability of both gels over time.Data were collected in a randomized crossover design, with each dog receiving both treatments under identical conditions. The table includes individual CTFT values (in µm) for each timepoint, as well as group means, standard deviations, and graphical representations of the CTFT evolution curves for both products.<b>File </b><b>contents:</b><br>– One Excel file containing raw CTFT values per dog, per product, per timepoint<br>– Averages, standard deviations, and visual plots of CTFT kinetics<br>– Details on measurement protocol, anesthesia, and OCT acquisition parameters<b>Purpose:</b><br>To quantitatively compare the ocular surface residence time of two veterinary tear supplements, providing evidence-based support for clinical decision-making in canine keratoconjunctival disorders.