five

Legislative Responses to Unconstitutionality: A View from the States

收藏
NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-10 收录
下载链接:
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WZB1EN
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
This article contributes to literature on legislative - court relations by incorporating the states. Pickerill (2004) examined Congressional responses to court rulings declaring statutes unconstitutional, classifying responses into three categories - amending, repealing, or doing nothing. I assembled a list of all Minnesota, Michigan, and Wyoming statutes declared unconstitutional from 1940 to 2008 by state or federal courts. I then determined the legislature's response. I find unexpected differences in state responsiveness, and between the states and Congress. Also, state legislatures are more likely to respond to a ruling of unconstitutionality from their own courts than from the federal courts.
创建时间:
2018-01-29
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作