Dataset from Ciconte G, Monasky MM, Santinelli V, Micaglio E, Vicedomini G, Anastasia L, Negro G, Borrelli V, Giannelli L, Santini F, de Innocentiis C, Rondine R, Locati ET, Bernardini A, Mazza BC, Mecarocci V, Ćalović Ž, Ghiroldi A, D'Imperio S, Benedetti S, Di Resta C, Rivolta I, Casari G, Petretto E, Pappone C. Brugada syndrome genetics is associated with phenotype severity. Eur Heart J. 2020 Nov 21:ehaa942. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa942. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33221895.

Dataset from Ciconte G, Monasky MM, Santinelli V, Micaglio E, Vicedomini G, Anastasia L, Negro G, Borrelli V, Giannelli L, Santini F, de Innocentiis C, Rondine R, Locati ET, Bernardini A, Mazza BC, Mecarocci V, Ćalović Ž, Ghiroldi A, D'Imperio S, Benedetti S, Di Resta C, Rivolta I, Casari G, Petretto E, Pappone C. Brugada syndrome genetics is associated with phenotype severity. Eur Heart J. 2020 Nov 21:ehaa942. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa942. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33221895.

This is the Abstract:

Aims : Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) in young, otherwise healthy individuals. Despite SCN5A being the most commonly known mutated gene to date, the genotype-phenotype relationship is poorly understood and remains uncertain. This study aimed to elucidate the genotype-phenotype correlation in BrS.

Methods and results: Brugada syndrome probands deemed at high risk of future arrhythmic events underwent genetic testing and phenotype characterization by the means of epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate (AS) mapping, and were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of SCN5A mutation. Two-hundred probands (160 males, 80%; mean age 42.6 ± 12.2 years) were included in this study. Patients harbouring SCN5A mutations exhibited a spontaneous type 1 pattern and experienced aborted cardiac arrest or spontaneous VT/VF more frequently than the other subjects. SCN5A-positive patients exhibited a larger epicardial AS area, more prolonged electrograms and more frequently observed non-invasive late potentials. The presence of an SCN5A mutation explained >26% of the variation in the epicardial AS area and was the strongest predictor of a large epicardial area.

Conclusion : In BrS, the genetic background is the main determinant for the extent of the electrophysiological abnormalities. SCN5A mutation carriers exhibit more pronounced epicardial electrical abnormalities and a more aggressive clinical presentation. These results contribute to the understanding of the genetic determinants of the BrS phenotypic expression and provide possible explanations for the varying degrees of disease expression.