Repeated-measures ANOVA results.

Background
Quantitative movement analysis is increasingly used to assess motor deficits, but joint angle calculations depend on assumptions about limb segment lengths. These lengths are often estimated from average anthropometric proportions rather than measured directly. The extent to which such assumptions influence joint angle accuracy and variability remains unclear.
Methods
In prior studies, we recorded reaching movements in nine healthy adults using active-marker motion capture system. In this study, we computed arm joint angles with a dynamic model scaled using either measured segment lengths (Individual method) or proportions based on body height (Average method). Each participant served as their own control across two modeling conditions. We compared segment proportions and the variability in joint angle trajectories arising from segment length assumptions (between-participant variability) with within-participant variability across repeated movements.
Results
Segment length proportions remained unchanged despite increases in population height. Joint angle trajectories derived from the two scaling methods were very similar. Segment length assumptions had only minor effects on joint angle amplitudes, primarily due to kinematic redundancy, and these effects were substantially smaller than the within-participant variability observed across repeated movements in most individuals. Importantly, while segment length estimates shifted absolute joint angle amplitudes, they did not alter the shape of angular trajectories.
Conclusions/significance
Morphological variability in segment lengths contributes less to joint angle variability than the variability expressed by individuals across repeated movements. This indicates that movement variability inherent in movement execution outweighs that introduced by morphological differences. These findings suggest that motion capture–based assessments of reaching quality remain accurate even when segment lengths are inferred from height, supporting their practical use in remote or telehealth clinical assessments where direct anthropometry is not feasible.