Additional file 2 of Functional similarity, despite taxonomical divergence in the millipede gut microbiota, points to a common trophic strategy

Additional file 2: Table S1. Mean values for colony counts and 16S rRNA copies. Table S2. Read counts and taxonomic classification of 16S rRNA amplicon sequence. Table S3. Sample information for metagenomic and metatranscriptomic sequencing. Table S4. Contig stats for de novo co-assembled reads from E. pulchripes. Table S5. Removal of potential eukaryotic and unknown contigs with Whokaryote. Table S6. Contig stat for de novo co-assembled reads from E. pulchripes and G. connexa. Table S7. Taxonomic classification of MAGs with GTDB-Tk. Table S8. Taxonomic classification of MAGs from E. pulchripes and G . connexa. Table S9. MAG coverage in quality-filtered metagenomic pair-end reads Table S10. Distributions of all CAZymes with or without signal peptides in bacterial MAGs from E. pulchripes and G. connexa. Table S11. Grouping of glycoside hydrolases at the family level. Table S12. Annotated Carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZymes) from MAGs using dbCAN2 meta web server. Table S13. Community gene annotation of the metagenome and metatranscriptome samples (prokaryotic co-assemblies). Table 14. Community relative abundance of genes involved in acetogenesis, hydrogenases and sulfur cycling for E. pulchripes and G. connexa. Table S15. Community gene annotation of the metagenome and metatranscriptome samples (prokaryotic co-assemblies). Table S16. Community relative abundance of genes involved in nitrogen cycling. Table S17. NCBI BioProject PRJNA948469.