Data for Post-retraction citation: A review of scholarly research on the spread of retracted science
收藏doi.org2025-01-15 收录
下载链接:
https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-3254797_V1
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Data for Post-retraction citation: A review of scholarly research on the spread of retracted science Schneider, Jodi; Das, Susmita; Léveillé, Jacqueline; Proescholdt, Randi Contact: Jodi Schneider jodi@illinois.edu & jschneider@pobox.com ********** OVERVIEW ********** This dataset provides further analysis for an ongoing literature review about post-retraction citation. This ongoing work extends a poster presented as: Jodi Schneider, Jacqueline Léveillé, Randi Proescholdt, Susmita Das, and The RISRS Team. Characterization of Publications on Post-Retraction Citation of Retracted Articles. Presented at the Ninth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication, September 8-10, 2022 hybrid in Chicago. https://hdl.handle.net/2142/114477 (now also in https://peerreviewcongress.org/abstract/characterization-of-publications-on-post-retraction-citation-of-retracted-articles/ ) Items as of the poster version are listed in the bibliography 92-PRC-items.pdf. Note that following the poster, we made several changes to the dataset (see changes-since-PRC-poster.txt). For both the poster dataset and the current dataset, 5 items have 2 categories (see 5-items-have-2-categories.txt). Articles were selected from the Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography (https://infoqualitylab.org/projects/risrs2020/bibliography/ and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5498474 ). The current dataset includes 92 items; 91 items were selected from the 386 total items in Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography version v.2.15.0 (July 2021); 1 item was added because it is the final form publication of a grouping of 2 items from the bibliography: Yang (2022) Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles http://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221097623 Items were classified into 7 topics; 2 of the 7 topics have been analyzed to date. ********************** OVERVIEW OF ANALYSIS ********************** DATA ANALYZED: 2 of the 7 topics have been analyzed to date: field-based case studies (n = 20) author-focused case studies of 1 or several authors with many retracted publications (n = 15) FUTURE DATA TO BE ANALYZED, NOT YET COVERED: 5 of the 7 topics have not yet been analyzed as of this release: database-focused analyses (n = 33) paper-focused case studies of 1 to 125 selected papers (n = 15) studies of retracted publications cited in review literature (n = 8) geographic case studies (n = 4) studies selecting retracted publications by method (n = 2) ************** FILE LISTING ************** ------------------ BIBLIOGRAPHY ------------------ 92-PRC-items.pdf ------------------ TEXT FILES ------------------ README.txt 5-items-have-2-categories.txt changes-since-PRC-poster.txt ------------------ CODEBOOKS ------------------ Codebook for authors.docx Codebook for authors.pdf Codebook for field.docx Codebook for field.pdf Codebook for KEY.docx Codebook for KEY.pdf ------------------ SPREADSHEETS ------------------ field.csv field.xlsx multipleauthors.csv multipleauthors.xlsx multipleauthors-not-named.csv multipleauthors-not-named.xlsx singleauthors.csv singleauthors.xlsx *************************** DESCRIPTION OF FILE TYPES *************************** BIBLIOGRAPHY (92-PRC-items.pdf) presents the items, as of the poster version. This has minor differences from the current data set. Consult changes-since-PRC-poster.txt for details on the differences. TEXT FILES provide notes for additional context. These files end in .txt. CODEBOOKS describe the data we collected. The same data is provided in both Word (.docx) and PDF format. There is one general codebook that is referred to in the other codebooks: Codebook for KEY lists fields assigned (e.g., for a journal or conference). Note that this is distinct from the overall analysis in the Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography of fields analyzed; for that analysis see Proescholdt, Randi (2021): RISRS Retraction Review - Field Variation Data. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-2070560_V1 Other codebooks document specific information we entered on each column of a spreadsheet. SPREADSHEETS present the data collected. The same data is provided in both Excel (.xlsx) and CSV format. Each data row describes a publication or item (e.g., thesis, poster, preprint). For column header explainations, see the associated codebook. ***************************** DETAILS ON THE SPREADSHEETS ***************************** field-based case studies CODEBOOK: Codebook for field --REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY DATA SHEET: field REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY --NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 20 NOTE: Each data row describes a publication/item. --NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 17 --GROUPED PUBLICATIONS: Rubbo (2019) - 2 items, Yang (2022) - 3 items author-focused case studies of 1 or several authors with many retracted publications CODEBOOK: Codebook for authors --REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY DATA SHEET 1: singleauthors (n = 9) --NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 9 --NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 9 DATA SHEET 2: multipleauthors (n = 5 --NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 5 --NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 5 DATA SHEET 3: multipleauthors-not-named (n = 1) --NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 1 --NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 1 ********************************* CRediT <http://credit.niso.org> ********************************* Susmita Das: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology Jaqueline Léveillé: Data curation, Investigation Randi Proescholdt: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology Jodi Schneider: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision
数据集描述:
关于撤稿后引文的数据:撤稿科学研究成果传播之文献综述
施耐德,乔迪;达斯,苏米塔;勒维利,雅克琳;普罗舍尔多,兰迪
联系方式:乔迪·施耐德 jodi@illinois.edu & jschneider@pobox.com
********** 概述 **********
本数据集旨在对撤稿后引文的相关文献进行进一步分析,以扩展先前在第九届国际同行评审和科学出版物大会上展示的海报内容:乔迪·施耐德,雅克琳·勒维利,兰迪·普罗舍尔多,苏米塔·达斯及RISRS团队。该海报内容为《撤稿文章撤稿后引文出版物的特征》,于2022年9月8日至10日在芝加哥举办的混合式会议上展示。相关链接:https://hdl.handle.net/2142/114477(现亦可在https://peerreviewcongress.org/abstract/characterization-of-publications-on-post-retraction-citation-of-retracted-articles/ 找到)。海报版本中的条目列于参考文献92-PRC-items.pdf中。请注意,自海报发布以来,我们对数据集进行了几项修改(详见changes-since-PRC-poster.txt)。对于海报数据集和当前数据集,有5个条目属于2个类别(见5-items-have-2-categories.txt)。文章选自《实证撤稿文献》书目(https://infoqualitylab.org/projects/risrs2020/bibliography/ 和 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5498474)。当前数据集包含92个条目;其中91个条目选自《实证撤稿文献》书目第v.2.15.0版(2021年7月)的386个总条目;另1个条目被添加,因为它是由书目中2个条目组成的组群的最后形式出版物:杨(2022年)《撤稿实践是否有效?来自心理学撤稿文章引文的证据》http://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221097623。条目被分类为7个主题;其中2个主题已进行分析。
********************** 分析概述 **********************
已分析的数据:截至本版本发布,已分析了7个主题中的2个:基于领域的案例研究(n = 20);针对1名或多名具有大量撤稿出版物的作者进行的案例研究(n = 15)。
未来待分析的数据,尚未涵盖:7个主题中的5个尚未分析:数据库分析(n = 33);针对1至125篇选定论文的案例研究(n = 15);对被综述文献引用的撤稿出版物的研究(n = 8);地理案例研究(n = 4);通过方法选择撤稿出版物的研究(n = 2)。
************** 文件清单 **************
------------------ 书目 ------------------
92-PRC-items.pdf
------------------ 文本文件 ------------------
README.txt
5-items-have-2-categories.txt
changes-since-PRC-poster.txt
------------------ 代码簿 ------------------
Codebook for authors.docx
Codebook for authors.pdf
Codebook for field.docx
Codebook for field.pdf
Codebook for KEY.docx
Codebook for KEY.pdf
------------------ 电子表格 ------------------
field.csv
field.xlsx
multipleauthors.csv
multipleauthors.xlsx
multipleauthors-not-named.csv
multipleauthors-not-named.xlsx
singleauthors.csv
singleauthors.xlsx
*************************** 文件类型描述 ***************************
书目(92-PRC-items.pdf)展示了海报版本中的条目。与当前数据集存在细微差异。关于差异的详细信息,请参阅changes-since-PRC-poster.txt。文本文件提供了额外的背景信息。这些文件以.txt结尾。代码簿描述了我们收集的数据。相同的数据以Word (.docx)和PDF格式提供。有一个通用的代码簿,被其他代码簿引用:Codebook for KEY列出了分配的字段(例如,对于期刊或会议)。请注意,这与《实证撤稿文献》书目中分析的领域整体分析不同;有关该分析,请参阅普罗舍尔多(2021年):RISRS撤稿审查 - 领域差异数据。伊利诺伊大学香槟分校。https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-2070560_V1。其他代码簿记录了我们在电子表格的每一列中输入的特定信息。电子表格展示了收集的数据。相同的数据以Excel (.xlsx)和CSV格式提供。每行数据描述一个出版物或条目(例如,论文、海报、预印本)。有关列标题的解释,请参阅相关的代码簿。
***************************** 电子表格详细信息 *****************************
基于领域的案例研究
代码簿:Codebook for field --REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY
数据表:field --REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY --数据行数:20
备注:每行数据描述一个出版物/条目。
分组出版物:Rubbo(2019)- 2个条目,杨(2022)- 3个条目
针对1名或多名具有大量撤稿出版物的作者进行的案例研究
代码簿:Codebook for authors --REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY
数据表1:singleauthors(n = 9)
数据行数:9
分组出版物:9
数据表2:multipleauthors(n = 5 --数据行数:5
分组出版物:5
数据表3:multipleauthors-not-named(n = 1)
数据行数:1
分组出版物:1
********************************* CRediT <http://credit.niso.org> *********************************
苏米塔·达斯:概念构思,数据整理,调查,方法论
雅克琳·勒维利:数据整理,调查
兰迪·普罗舍尔多:概念构思,数据整理,调查,方法论
乔迪·施耐德:概念构思,数据整理,资金获取,调查,方法论,项目管理,监督
提供机构:
Illinois Data Bank



