Comparison of conservation outcomes with risk averse weighting.

Here weight given to the future is determined with the trade-off curves (Fig. 4), by accepting a reduction of 5% in conservation of baseline distributions. The diagonal shows the average and minimum (in brackets) proportion of species future distributions represented in the top 10% priority sites, when planning is done with same scenario that eventually takes place. Numbers outside diagonal show the average and minimum representation of future distributions when planning is done for one scenario, but another takes place. Top 10% of all prioritizations achieve, on average, 45% representation of species baseline time period distributions, minimum representation across species being 4%.