five

Frequency of mentioning the issue in online restaurant reviews, the experience attribution, and restaurant evaluation

收藏
DataCite Commons2024-03-26 更新2025-04-16 收录
下载链接:
https://repod.icm.edu.pl/citation?persistentId=doi:10.18150/31WIV1
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
The data consist of datasets from two online experiments with Polish young adults (Study 1 and 2) on the relationship between the online restaurant review characteristics and consumer response to the review.In Study 1, the manipulated variables were: frequency of mentioning the negative issue, attribution cue (outside vs. inside attribution of the issue), and consumer analytical information processing. The measured variables were: restaurant evaluation, perceived issue attribution, and consumer analytical information processing.In Study 2, the manipulated variables were: the frequency of mentioning the negative issue, attribution cue (outside vs. inside attribution of the issue), and the importance cue (the issue presented as important vs. unimportant). The measured variables were: restaurant evaluation, perceived issue attribution, and perceived issue importance.The data are the supplementary material for:Trzebiński, Marciniak (2022). There is no smoke without fire: How frequency information and the experience attribution make negative online restaurant reviews more harmful. PLoS ONE, 17(7): e0271357, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271357
提供机构:
RepOD
创建时间:
2022-07-02
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务