Anast et al., 2022, MicrobiologyOpen - Table S1 - 08-22-2022.xlsx

<strong>Table S1. Comparative genomics, proteomics, and transcriptomics of pLM80, pLM5446, and pLM7802.</strong> <br> L. monocytogenes plasmid results are presented from left to right as follows: pLM5446, pLM7802, and pLM80 genome information and gene expression results from the studies Assisi et al. 2021, Guariglia-Oropeza et al. 2018, and Tang et al. 2015. This is then followed by comparative protein blasts of pLM7802 against pLM80, pLM7802 against pLM5446, and pLM80 against pLM5446. The similarity between protein sequences is denoted as percent amino acid identity shared between the plasmids and then by percent query coverage. Grey rows indicate that the corresponding CDS was duplicated within the plasmid module to align homologs found between each plasmid. This was done to account for several predicted protein sequences from pLM80 and pLM5446 that had multiple homologs within the pLM7802 proteome. Within the individual plasmid modules “Locus tag” indicates the assigned locus tag of each predicted CDS, “Product” denotes the predicted final product from each gene, “Gene name” designates the short name of each gene where applicable, and “Pfam protein domain(s)” shows the predicted Pfam protein domains within each amino acid sequence generated by the eggNOG-mapper (http://eggnog-mapper.embl.de/ ). Gene expression results are first assigned by the publication, followed by either “log2FoldChange” (log2 fold change of gene) or “Q-value” (p-value adjusted for errors from multiple testing). Gene expression data is only displayed for genes that had Q-values ≤ 0.05.