Comparison of Cross-Validation Consistency (CVC) and Test Accuracy (TA) between GEE-GMDR and the GMDR method for two simulated continuous traits.

NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-09 收录

下载链接：

https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Comparison_of_Cross_Validation_Consistency_CVC_and_Test_Accuracy_TA_between_GEE_GMDR_and_the_GMDR_method_for_two_simulated_continuous_traits_/1185098

下载链接

链接失效反馈

官方服务：

资源简介：

aThe genotypes with two uppercase-letter alleles (i.e., AAbb, AaBb, aaBB) are set as high-risk group and the rest as the low-risk group. bThe genotypes with three uppercase-letter alleles are set as high-risk group and the rest as the low-risk group. cThe genotypes with four uppercase-letter alleles are set as high-risk group and the rest as the low-risk group. dGEE-GMDR is the GEE-GMDR analysis for the simulated bivariate traits. eGMDR-T1 is the unvariate GMDR analysis for trait 1. fGMDR-T2 is the univariate GMDR analysis for trait 2. Comparison of Cross-Validation Consistency (CVC) and Test Accuracy (TA) between GEE-GMDR and the GMDR method for two simulated continuous traits.

创建时间：

2014-09-26