five

Using a \"sledgehammer\" approach to increase systems thinking with a brief manipulation

收藏
DataONE2025-06-06 更新2025-06-21 收录
下载链接:
https://search.dataone.org/view/sha256:3aaed2dc9a60f6f3abfc182b7a88234e8a9ba8ffe958a4c54f153fc7c196e0fb
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Systems thinking is a skill that is essential to understanding and taking effective action on complex challenges such as climate change. This research evaluated whether systems thinking could be increased with a brief intervention. Participants (N = 678) recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk all completed the Systems Thinking Scale (Randel & Stroink, 2018), which was used as a covariate. Participants were then randomly assigned to one of four conditions. Some participants (n = 165) watched an entertaining 5-minute video describing systems thinking with a real-life example (Cats in Borneo, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17BP9n6g1F0). Others (n = 174) watched this video, read a definition of systems thinking, and were asked to engage in systems thinking while completing a survey. This was designed to be a \"sledgehammer\" condition, in which we made our manipulation as heavy-handed as possible. A third (control) condition (n = 167) watched a video about how to fold a fitted sheet...., Participants were recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk. All participants were adults living in the United States.  We gave 10 different measures that capture some aspect of systems thinking: The Systems Thinking Scale (Randle & Stroink, 2018): This 15-item self-report scale measures someone's dispositional tendency to engage in systems thinking. Negatively worded items were recoded, and all items were averaged together. Higher scores = more systems thinking. This trait measure was given at the start of the study and was used as a covariate. The Murder Scenario (Choi et al., 2007): Participants read a brief description of a murder case and indicated which of 96 possible facts were irrelevant to the case. We recoded the items such that 1 = relevant, 0 = irrelevant. The recoded items were summed together. Choosing more items indicates more holistic thinking about causality. Ripple Effect Question: Driver Scenario: Based on measures developed by Maddux & Yuki (2006). Participan..., , # Using a \"sledgehammer\" approach to increase systems thinking with a brief manipulation [https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.v9s4mw75b](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.v9s4mw75b) ## Description of the data and file structure The data appear in the file DataForIncreasing STWithBriefManipulation.csv. Variable descriptions and values appear in the file MetaDataForIncreasing STWithBriefManipulation.csv.  ### Files and variables #### File: DataForIncreasingSTWithBriefManipulation.csv **Description:** Raw data that has not been published. The data file was generated in SPSS but exported to csv format for accessibility. Each row corresponds to a single participant. Missing data occurred when online participants failed to complete a question. Missing data is indicated with an empty field. ##### Variables | Variable | Position | Label ...,
创建时间:
2025-06-07
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作