Supporting data for "Myth-busting the provider-user relationship for digital sequence information"

The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) formally recognized the sovereign rights of nations over their biological diversity. Implicit within the treaty is the idea that mega-biodiverse countries will provide genetic resources and grant access to them and scientists in high-income countries will use these resources and share back benefits. However, little research has been conducted on how this framework is reflected in real-life scientific practice. Currently, parties to the CBD are debating whether digital sequence information (DSI) should be regulated under a new benefit-sharing framework. At this critical time point in the upcoming international negotiations, we test the fundamental hypothesis of provision and use by looking at the global patterns of access and use in scientific publications. Our data reject the provider-user relationship and suggest far more complex information flow for digital sequence information. Therefore, any new policy decisions on digital sequence information should be aware of the high level of use of DSI across low- and middle-income countries and seek to preserve open access to this crucial common good.