Data underlying the publication: A holistic look at creativity: Evaluating pupils’ creative design ideation and prototypes through comparative judgment

This study investigates how 20 industrial design students used the method of comparative judgment to holistically assess design ideas and prototypes produced by 201 pupils aged 10 to 14 in the Netherlands. This dataset includes (1) the codebook used to code the comments generated by industrial design students (acting as judges) during the process of comparative judgment, using the platform of No More Marking, (2) judges’ decision data about pupils’ design ideation, design prototype, and design by types—obtained from No More Marking, (3) the parameter values and rankings of portfolios (design ideation, design prototype, design by types), and judge misfit data obtained from the Adaptive Comparative Judgement App (https://jeffbuckley1992.shinyapps.io/comparative_judgement/), (4) code examination and inter-rater reliability data.

本研究探究了20名工业设计专业学生如何运用比较判断法（comparative judgment），对荷兰201名10至14岁小学生产出的设计创意与原型开展整体性评估。本数据集包含以下内容：(1) 编码手册，用于编码工业设计学生（作为评委）在借助No More Marking平台开展比较判断流程时生成的评论；(2) 评委针对小学生的设计创意、设计原型以及分类式设计作品的决策数据，该数据源自No More Marking平台；(3) 各作品集（涵盖设计创意、设计原型、分类式设计作品）的参数值与排名，以及从自适应比较判断应用（Adaptive Comparative Judgement App，https://jeffbuckley1992.shinyapps.io/comparative_judgement/）获取的评委拟合不良数据；(4) 编码检验结果与评分者间信度数据。