Applications of remote sensing for biodiversity conservation typically rely on image classifications that do not capture variability within coarse land cover classes. Here, we compare two measures der
A dataset containing 79 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "TaxonKey" : [ "is Salmo obtusirostris (Heckel, 1851)" ] } The dataset includes 79 records from 16 constituent
A dataset containing 70245 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "TaxonKey" : [ "is Picumnus Temminck, 1825" ] } The dataset includes 70245 records from 195 constituent data
A dataset containing 858 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "and" : [ "TaxonKey is Chloephaga rubidiceps P.L.Sclater, 1861", "HasCoordinate is true", "Geometry POLYGON((-7
A dataset containing 87 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "TaxonKey" : [ "is Mycteroperca xenarcha Jordan, 1888" ] } The dataset includes 87 records from 16 constituent