Subgroup Analyses.

Values are given as arithmetic mean ± standard deviation (SD) or number of patients (%).The scale used for preparation and information prior to the test comfort, and overall satisfaction was: 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = moderate, 4 = poor, 5 = very poor. Helplessness was rated as: 1 = no helplessness, 2 = little, 3 = moderate, 4 = intense, 5 = very intense. Pain intensity was assessed on an unmarked 100-mm visual analogue scale. Preferences were given by selecting one of three possible answers: CTA/CTP, CCA, or both equivalent. A total of four subgroup analyses were performed: 1) patients with revascularization versus patients without revascularization during CCA (n = 42 versus n = 46); 2) patients with FFR versus patients without FFR during CCA (n = 8 versus n = 80); 3) patients with suture closure system versus patients with manual compression after CCA (n = 66 versus n = 22); and 4) women versus men (n = 17 versus n = 71). The other subgroup analyses revealed no significant differencesSubgroup Analyses.