Distractor intrusions are the result of delayed attentional engagement: A new temporal variability account of attentional selectivity in dynamic visual tasks - data from 4 experiments

The two files reflect the full behavioural results and main ERP results from 4 experiments. Each sheet reflects one experiment. <br><b>The ERP recording information was as follows: </b>A 500-Hz sampling rate with a 40 Hz low-pass filter was applied. Channels were referenced online to a left-earlobe electrode, and re-referenced offline to an average of both earlobes. An additional 10 hz filter was applied to all electrodes apart from the HEOG electrodes after EEG acquisition. Trials with eye blinks (exceeding ±60 µV at Fpz), horizontal eye movements (exceeding ±30 µV in the HEOG channels), and muscle movement artifacts (exceeding ±80 µV at all other channels) were removed as artifacts. EEG was segmented into epochs from from 100 ms before to 500 ms after the onset of the target frame, relative to a 100 ms pre-stimulus baseline. The ERP results file average LRP difference wave (contralateral minus ipsilateral) at PO7 and PO8 electrodes. Averaged ERP waveforms were computed for trials with a target in the left or right RSVP stream, and LRPs triggered by the target frame were computed by comparing ERPs at electrodes PO7/PO8 contralateral and ipsilateral to the location of the target. Each column reflect the average results of a single participant, as a function of their response - correct vs. distractor intrusion.<br>