Moving Stimuli Are Less Effectively Masked Using Traditional Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) Compared to a Moving Mondrian Mask (MMM): A Test Case for Feature-Selective Suppression and Retinotopic Adaptation

These are the data reported in: Moors P, Wagemans J, de-Wit L (2014) Moving Stimuli Are Less Effectively Masked Using Traditional Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) Compared to a Moving Mondrian Mask (MMM): A Test Case for Feature-Selective Suppression and Retinotopic Adaptation. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98298. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098298 Two files contain the experimental data, one the simulation data, and the last one the explanation of all the variables in the three data files.