five

Health care resource utilization patterns among patients with Parkinson’s disease psychosis: analysis of Medicare beneficiaries treated with pimavanserin or other-atypical antipsychotics

收藏
Taylor & Francis Group2024-03-21 更新2026-04-16 收录
下载链接:
https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Health_care_resource_utilization_patterns_among_patients_with_Parkinson_s_disease_psychosis_analysis_of_Medicare_beneficiaries_treated_with_pimavanserin_or_other-atypical_antipsychotics/21718252/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Pimavanserin (PIM) is the only FDA-approved atypical antipsychotic (AAP) for hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson’s disease psychosis (PDP). Comparative real-world analyses demonstrating its benefits are needed. To evaluate health care resource utilization (HCRU) outcomes among PDP patients treated with PIM vs. other-AAPs. Retrospective cohort analysis of Parts A, B, and D claims from 100% Medicare sample from 01 January 2013–31 December 2019 was conducted. PDP Patients initiating (i.e. index date) continuous monotherapy (PIM vs. other-AAPs) for ≥12-months during 01 January 2014–31 December 2018 without 12-months pre-index AAP use were selected after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) on 31 variables (sex, race, region, age, and 27 Elixhauser comorbidities). HCRU outcomes included: annual all-cause and psychiatric hospitalization (short-term stay, long-term stay, and SNF-stay [skilled nursing facility]) rates, annual all-cause and psychiatric-ER visit rates, mean per-patient-per-year (PPPY) hospitalizations, and average length of stay (ALOS). PIM and other-AAPs were compared using generalized linear models (GLM) controlled for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, coexisting-dementia, and coexisting insomnia. Of 12,164 PDP patients, 48.41% (<i>n</i> = 5,889) were female, and mean age was 77 (±8.14) years. Among 1:1 matched patients (<i>n</i> = 842 in each), 37.8% (<i>n</i> = 319) on PIM vs. 49.8% (<i>n</i> = 420) on other-AAPs (<i>p</i> &lt; .05) reported ≥1 all-cause hospitalizations, respectively. Specifically, short-term and SNF-stay among PIM patients vs. other-AAPs were: 34% (<i>n</i> = 286) vs. 46.2% (<i>n</i> = 389) and 20.2% (<i>n</i> = 170) vs. 31.8% (<i>n</i> = 267) (<i>p</i> &lt; .05), respectively. Similarly, 9.6% (<i>n</i> = 81) of PIM vs. 14.6% (<i>n</i> = 123) of other-AAPs patients had ≥1 psychiatric hospitalization (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). Furthermore, ≥1 all-cause and psychiatric ER visit among PIM vs. other-AAPs were 61.6% (<i>n</i> = 519) vs. 69.4% (<i>n</i> = 584) and 5.2% (<i>n</i> = 43) vs. 10.2% (<i>n</i> = 86) (<i>p</i> &lt; .05), respectively. PIM also had significantly lower ALOS, and mean PPPY short-term hospitalization and SNF-stays. In this analysis of PDP patients, PIM monotherapy resulted in nearly 12% and 7% lower all-cause hospitalizations and ER visits vs. other-AAPs.
提供机构:
Rajagopalan, Krithika; Kumar, Shikhar; Rashid, Nazia; Doshi, Dilesh
创建时间:
2022-12-13
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务