登录后查看消息通知
搜索
常见问题
消息
登录
首页
/
数据集
/
Appendix A. Simulations comparing aggregated boosted trees and boosted trees.
Appendix A. Simulations comparing aggregated boosted trees and boosted trees.
收藏
Figshare
2016-08-05 更新
2026-04-29 收录
机器学习模型比较
提升树算法评估
数据链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Appendix_A_Simulations_comparing_aggregated_boosted_trees_and_boosted_trees_/3527198
数据链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
问题咨询
购买咨询
在线客服
NEW
资源简介:
Simulations comparing aggregated boosted trees and boosted trees.
应用场景:
创建时间:
2016-08-05
相关数据集
Performance of the four machine-learning models for PIH prediction.
高血压预测
机器学习模型比较
Performance of the four machine-learning models for PIH prediction.
NIAID Data Ecosystem
7
0
Figure 2. Comparison of ML Models in Predicting the Physicochemical Properties of Antibiotic Drugs Using R², MSE, MAE, and RMSE..docx
抗生素耐药性预测
机器学习模型比较
Comparison of ML Models in Predicting the Physicochemical Properties of Antibiotic Drugs
DataCite Commons
2025-05-24 更新
5
0
5-fold cross-validation performance and statistical comparison between CatBoost and Logistic regression models.
机器学习模型比较
分类器性能评估
5-fold cross-validation performance and statistical comparison between CatBoost and Logistic regression models.
NIAID Data Ecosystem
2
0
LLM API Providers Leaderboard- Comparison of Model
机器学习模型比较
LLMAPI
Comparison of over 100 AI models from OpenAI, Google, DeepSeek & others
kaggle
2025-07-03 更新
6
0
Extreme Gradient Boosting as a Method for Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships
分子活性预测
机器学习模型比较
In the pharmaceutical industry it is common to generate many QSAR models from training sets containing a large number of molecules and a large number of descriptors. The best QSAR methods are those th
NIAID Data Ecosystem
4
0
© 2023-2026 上海数据发展科技有限责任公司 版权所有
沪ICP备17003045号-15
沪公网安备31010402336585号
热门搜索
社区交流群
科研交流群
商业服务
数据资源
寻源服务
数据采集
标注服务
数据产品
代理销售
数据领域
凭证登记
数据产品
介绍推广