Safety and Immunogenicity of DNA and MVA HIV-1 Subtype C Vaccine Prime-Boost Regimens: A Phase I Randomised Trial in HIV-Uninfected Indian Volunteers
收藏Figshare2016-01-18 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Safety_and_Immunogenicity_of_DNA_and_MVA_HIV_1_Subtype_C_Vaccine_Prime_Boost_Regimens_A_Phase_I_Randomised_Trial_in_HIV_Uninfected_Indian_Volunteers__/156747
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Study DesignA randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled phase I trial. MethodsThe trial was conducted in 32 HIV-uninfected healthy volunteers to assess the safety and immunogenicity of prime-boost vaccination regimens with either 2 doses of ADVAX, a DNA vaccine containing Chinese HIV-1 subtype C env gp160, gag, pol and nef/tat genes, as a prime and 2 doses of TBC-M4, a recombinant MVA encoding Indian HIV-1 subtype C env gp160, gag, RT, rev, tat, and nef genes, as a boost in Group A or 3 doses of TBC-M4 alone in Group B participants. Out of 16 participants in each group, 12 received vaccine candidates and 4 received placebos. ResultsBoth vaccine regimens were found to be generally safe and well tolerated. The breadth of anti-HIV binding antibodies and the titres of anti-HIV neutralizing antibodies were significantly higher (pst and 2nd MVA doses as compared to the responses in group B volunteers. However, the priming effect was short lasting leading to no difference in the frequency, breadth and magnitude of IFN-γELISPOT responses between the groups at 3, 6 and 9 months post-last vaccination. ConclusionsAlthough DNA priming resulted in enhancement of immune responses after 1st MVA boosting, the overall DNA prime MVA boost was not found to be immunologically superior to homologous MVA boosting. Trial RegistrationClinical Trial Registry CTRI/2009/091/000051
创建时间:
2016-01-18



