Replication Data for: The Fossil-Fueled Roots of Climate Inaction in Authoritarian Regimes

Why do some authoritarian regimes contribute more to climate change than others? I suggest that climate inaction in non-democracies is shaped by a combination of fossil fuel wealth and executive constraints. Fossil fuel wealth undermines climate action by giving leaders of authoritarian regimes incentives to capture oil and gas rents that help them maintain power. Executive constraints, however, can restrict carbon-intensive rent-seeking and therefore moderate the role of fossil fuel wealth in undermining climate action. This argument provides a novel explanation for variation in efforts to address climate change among non-democracies: the lack of institutional constraints on autocratic leaders’ use of fossil fuel wealth for political gain. I evaluate this argument using panel data on greenhouse gas emissions, oil and gas income, and executive constraints in 108 countries governed by authoritarian regimes between 1990-2021, finding that oil and gas income leads to higher emissions, but that these effects decline significantly with executive constraints.