Study 2 dissertation

This research examines how attachment styles moderate the effect of message factors on willingness to use advice. A pilot study sought to determine various advice categories romantic partners discuss. Participants (N = 270) completed an online questionnaire. Five advice problem situation categories emerged. The main study sought to examine differences among attachment styles and advice factors and outcome, and how attachment styles moderate how message factors affect willingness to comply with advice. Participants (N = 463) read four advice messages and then rated message characteristics. Less avoidant and less anxious participants rated most of the advice factors higher than more avoidant and more anxious participants. Absence of limitations and confirmation were important advice factors for more anxious participants in increasing their willingness to comply with advice. The results integrate theory in attachment processes and advice response theory, as well as having practical implications for advice communication and romantic relationships.本研究探讨了依恋风格（attachment style）如何调节信息因素对个体采纳建议意愿的影响。预实验旨在明确浪漫伴侣间所讨论的各类建议议题范畴，共有270名参与者完成线上问卷，最终归纳出五类建议相关的问题情境类别。正式实验则聚焦于探究不同依恋风格、各类建议因素与建议采纳结果之间的差异，以及依恋风格如何调节信息因素对个体遵从建议意愿的影响，共有463名参与者阅读了四条建议信息，并对信息特征进行评分。研究结果显示，低回避型与低焦虑型依恋的参与者对多数建议因素的评分显著高于高回避型与高焦虑型依恋的参与者；对于高焦虑型依恋的参与者而言，“无限制条件”与“信息确认”是提升其遵从建议意愿的核心建议因素。本研究结果既整合了依恋过程理论与建议回应理论，同时也为建议沟通实践与浪漫亲密关系的优化提供了重要参考价值。

搜集汇总

背景与挑战

背景概述

该数据集基于一项心理学研究，探讨依恋风格如何调节消息因素（如无限制、确认）对伴侣建议遵从意愿的影响。研究通过预研究（N=270）识别了五类建议问题情境，主研究（N=463）发现低回避和低焦虑参与者对建议因素评价更高，而高焦虑参与者对特定因素更敏感。结果整合了依恋理论和建议响应理论，对亲密关系中的建议沟通具有实践意义。