five

Datasheet2_Comparing different scoring systems for predicting mortality risk in preterm infants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.docx

收藏
NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-05-01 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Datasheet2_Comparing_different_scoring_systems_for_predicting_mortality_risk_in_preterm_infants_a_systematic_review_and_network_meta-analysis_docx/24819615
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the predictive values of eight scoring systems (Neonatal Critical Illness Score [NCIS], Neonatal Therapeutical Intervention Score System [NTISS], Clinical Risk Index for Babies [CRIB], Clinical Risk Index for Babies II [CRIB-II], Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology Perinatal Extension [SNAPPE], Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology Perinatal Extension II [SNAPPE-II], Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology [SNAP], and Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology II [SNAP-II]) for the mortality risk among preterm infants. MethodsThe Embase, PubMed, Chinese Biomedical Database, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to collect studies that compared different scoring systems in predicting the mortality risk in preterm infants from database inception to March 2023. Literature screening, data extraction, and bias risk assessment were independently conducted by two researchers. Subsequently, the random-effects model was used for the network meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 19 articles were included, comprising 14,377 preterm infants and 8 scoring systems. Compared to CRIB-II, NCIS, NTISS, SNAP-II, and SNAPPE-II, CRIB demonstrated better predictive efficiency for preterm infant mortality risk (P < 0.05). Relative to CRIB, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE, SNAP-II had worse predictive efficiency for preterm infant mortality risk (P < 0.05). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve of the eight scoring systems was as follows: CRIB (0.980) > SNAPPE (0.718) >SNAP (0.534) >CRIB-II (0.525) >NTISS (0.478) >NCIS (0.422) >SNAPPE-II (0.298) >SNAP-II (0.046). ConclusionThe CRIB scoring system showed the highest accuracy in predicting preterm infant mortality risk and was simple to perform. Therefore, CRIB selection can be prioritized in clinical practice. Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=434731, PROSPERO (CRD42023434731).
创建时间:
2023-12-15
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作