Data underlying the publication: An investigation of digital infrastructure’s role in repair and reuse of timber-based components in multi-story timber buildings: an interdisciplinary case study of digital product passport

Appendices B...E supply the analytical dataset used to compare alternative structural design methods for racking walls in light timber frame (LTF) multistory buildings. The study’s objective is to quantify how different load evaluation rules, system and element design assumptions influence calculated utilisation rate, deflection and tension anchoring demand in multistorey timber buildings. The research is documentary-analytical: formulae and variable definitions were extracted from international (Eurocodes 5) and national Finnish guidances, as well as calculation sheets of a case project retrieved from municipal archives, then summarized in a tabular format. Introductory Appendix B (.pdf) lists the governing equations and symbols, informing context of Excel files (C...E) and the main text. Appendix C (.xlsx) illustrates numerical load distribution scenarios for five different design methods. Geometrical and product property data is extracted from case project documentation as retrieved from municipal archives. Missing product data is complemented with educated guess based on product manufacturer documentation, as informed in the main publication. Appendix D (.xlsx) provides background for fastener positional factors, illustrating sources of deviation between different versions of design guidance. Appendix E (.xlsx) informs comparative summary of earlier design methods related to shear design capacity and deflection of the LTF shear wall (3 different walls), comparing them to the results of incoming Eurocode 5 (Appendix H) design method allowing for partial tension anchoring calculation. Together these tables form a semi-structured dataset of input parameters and computed results that underpin the comparative analysis reported in the main publication. Detailed context and references are available from the main publication.

附录B至E提供了用于对比多层轻型木结构（Light Timber Frame, LTF）建筑中抗侧剪力墙替代结构设计方法的分析数据集。本研究旨在量化不同荷载评估准则、体系与构件设计假设，对多层木结构建筑中计算所得的结构利用率、挠度以及受拉锚固需求的影响。本研究属于文献分析类研究：研究人员从欧洲规范5（Eurocodes 5）、芬兰国家设计指南，以及从市政档案中调取的某案例项目的计算表格中提取公式与变量定义，随后以表格形式进行汇总整理。作为引言部分的附录B（.pdf格式）列出了核心控制方程与符号体系，为后续Excel文件（附录C至E）与正文内容提供背景说明。附录C（.xlsx格式）展示了五种不同设计方法对应的数值荷载分布场景。几何参数与产品属性数据均从市政档案获取的案例项目文档中提取，缺失的产品数据则依据主出版物中提及的产品制造商文档进行合理推测补充。附录D（.xlsx格式）提供了紧固件位置系数的相关背景信息，阐明了不同版本设计指南之间的偏差来源。附录E（.xlsx格式）提供了与3面轻型木结构（LTF）抗剪剪力墙的抗剪设计承载力及挠度相关的早期设计方法的对比汇总，并将这些方法与即将施行的欧洲规范5（附录H）中允许开展局部受拉锚固计算的设计方法的结果进行了对比。上述表格共同构成了包含输入参数与计算结果的半结构化数据集，为正文中报道的对比分析提供了核心支撑。详细背景与参考文献可参见主出版物。