Recursive Spiral-Time Host-Selection Audit Archive v0.8: Null-Ladder Tests, Native 6D Carrier Construction, Orientation Fingerprints, and Kinetic-Prefactor Response in the HLV Framework

This archive contains the reproducible simulation and audit outputs for the updated Recursive Spiral-Time Host-Selection Audit within the Helix–Light–Vortex (HLV) framework, including the original v0.8/v1.3–v1.9 master-ledger lineage and the new Stage-10, Stage-11, and Stage-12 run packages. The purpose of the archive is not to claim physical validation of HLV, spacetime emergence, quantum-field-theoretic recovery, particle derivation, Standard Model recovery, mass recovery, or BD17A validation. Instead, the archive documents a staged, hash-locked, null-gated computational audit designed to test which parts of a recursive triadic Spiral-Time / native-6D carrier construction survive hard controls, which parts remain admissible only as construction gates, and which claims are blocked. The updated archive includes the original run ZIP files, extracted result folders, locked configuration files, source/configuration hashes, audit manifests, claim-state ledgers, summary tables, figures, review notes, and manuscript-level documentation for the following stages: Stage 0: Run A/B smoke test. Stage 1: Run A/B primary 10k null-ladder audit. Stage 2: Run C scaling and non-circularity test across n = 2, 3, 4, 5. Stage 3: Native 6D carrier construction with no projected-kNN primary carrier. Stage 4: Broad residualized carrier-fingerprint test. Stage 4B: Orientation-sensitive native-carrier fingerprint test, including primary and deep runs. Stage 5: Spiral-Time kinetic-prefactor response test. Stage 6A: Adversarial generic k* = 6 test showing that the rank-6 value is generic row-closure / Sym^2(R^3) behavior rather than HLV-specific evidence. Stage 6B: Independent orientation-sensitive native-carrier fingerprint replication under frozen features, disjoint seeds, residualization, and declared hard orientation nulls. This remains the main Category-A positive computational result. Stage 7: Carrier-derived skew-adjoint Ce prelock. This verifies construction quality only: skew-adjointness, unitarity, and reverse-edge consistency. It performs no BD17A scoring and implies no physical validation. Stage 8: Blind BD17A pilot using the locked Stage-7 Ce channel. This run is blocked: the target does not align with theta* = 2/9 beyond hard nulls. Stage 8B: BD17A failure diagnostics. This stage diagnoses the Stage-8 failure as determinant-line flat-grid collapse. The post-hoc scale sweep is not admitted as a rescue. Stage 9 / Run M: Carrier-derived dynamic skew-adjoint Ce preflight. This stage tests whether a dynamic non-flat successor class can escape the flat/static determinant-line collapse. The Stage-9 result is a preflight / admissibility result only. It does not score BD17A, does not compare to theta* = 2/9, and does not validate HLV-specific physics. Stage WN1: Nested Spiral-Time acceptance-window control on a finite 6D parent set. The run is blocked/inconclusive as a specificity prelock. Stage WN2: Native 6D nested memory-window carrier using accepted nodes and shell edges, with no projected-kNN primary graph. The target readout is high, but a coordinate-permuted projection null ties or marginally outperforms the target. The run is blocked/inconclusive. Stage WN3: Native 6D nested weight-recovery stress test with locked golden weights. The matched-irrational silver control outperforms the target. The run is blocked/inconclusive and is consistent with earlier restrictions on phi-specificity. Stage WN4: Native 6D nested window dictionary scored against the frozen HLV golden nested dictionary. Non-nested and random/null variants are not defeated. The run is blocked/inconclusive. Stage 10 / Run N: Blind BD17A comparison of the frozen Stage-9 dynamic skew-adjoint Ce class against theta* = 2/9. This run is negative: the target median kernel score is below the best hard dynamic null, the target-minus-best-null margin is negative, and the target candidate fraction is zero. Therefore BD17A remains blocked for the frozen dynamic successor route. Stage-10 run DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21154319. Stage 11 / Run O: Endogenous dynamic-Ce docking-landscape analysis. This run reverses the Stage-10 question by not imposing the external theta* = 2/9 target. Instead, it maps the internal holonomy landscape of the frozen dynamic Ce generator and searches for endogenous docking loci using discovery/validation splits. The strongest discovered locus lies at 0 mod 2pi/3, i.e. the flat-grid boundary, and is better explained by the flat-static null. Therefore no specific endogenous HLV dynamic-Ce docking locus is established. Stage 12 / Run P: Broad native-6D adversarial replication of the Stage-6B orientation-sensitive native-car Stage 13 ,14, 15,16 included